| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Accidentally added in https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/26473/files
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adds a new `no-sloppy-imports` lint rule and cleans up the lint code.
Closes #22844
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno_lint/issues/1293
|
|
|
|
The stderr stream from the LSP is consumed by a separate thread, so it
may not have processed the part we care about yet. Instead, wait until
you see the measure for the request you care about.
|
|
VScode will typically send a `textDocument/semanticTokens/full` request
followed by `textDocument/semanticTokens/range`, and occassionally
request semantic tokens even when we know nothing has changed. Semantic
tokens also get refreshed on each change. Computing semantic tokens is
relatively heavy in TSC, so we should avoid it as much as possible.
Caches the semantic tokens for open documents, to avoid making TSC do
unnecessary work. Results in a noticeable improvement in local
benchmarking
before:
```
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1079ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 59ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 9921ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
after:
```
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 395ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1024ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 56ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 438ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 8927ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
|
|
|
|
Moves sloppy import resolution from the loader to the resolver.
Also adds some test helper functions to make the lsp tests less verbose
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
|
|
This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger
repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload.
The repo being benchmarked is
[deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored
along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its
fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual
requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a
file (to simulate an actual user interaction).
The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures
how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The
improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with
larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement.
Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new
benchmark is the last one listed):
**1.42.0**
```test
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 379ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1142ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 51ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 443ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 25121ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
**1.42.3**
```text
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1135ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 55ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 11675ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
|
|
This functionality was broken. The series of events was:
1. Load the npm resolution from the lockfile.
2. Discover only a subset of the specifiers in the documents.
3. Clear the npm snapshot.
4. Redo npm resolution with the new specifiers (~500ms).
What this now does:
1. Load the npm resolution from the lockfile.
2. Discover only a subset of the specifiers in the documents and take
into account the specifiers from the lockfile.
3. Do not redo resolution (~1ms).
|
|
|
|
I think it was occassionally reading the diagnostics from the previous
cache command rather than the config update.
Closes #22481
|
|
As discussed with @mmastrac.
---------
Signed-off-by: Asher Gomez <ashersaupingomez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
|
