| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Fixes #22995. Fixes #23000.
There were a handful of bugs here causing the hang (each with a
corresponding minimized test):
- We were canceling recv futures when `receiveMessageOnPort` was called,
but this caused the "receive loop" in the message port to exit. This was
due to the fact that `CancelHandle`s are never reset (i.e., once you
`cancel` a `CancelHandle`, it remains cancelled). That meant that after
`receieveMessageOnPort` was called, the subsequent calls to
`op_message_port_recv_message` would throw `Interrupted` exceptions, and
we would exit the loop.
The cancellation, however, isn't actually necessary.
`op_message_port_recv_message` only borrows the underlying port for long
enough to poll the receiver, so the borrow there could never overlap
with `op_message_port_recv_message_sync`.
- Calling `MessagePort.unref()` caused the "receive loop" in the message
port to exit. This was because we were setting
`messageEventListenerCount` to 0 on unref. Not only does that break the
counter when multiple `MessagePort`s are present in the same thread, but
we also exited the "receive loop" whenever the listener count was 0. I
assume this was to prevent the recv promise from keeping the event loop
open.
Instead of this, I chose to just unref the recv promise as needed to
control the event loop.
- The last bug causing the hang (which was a doozy to debug) ended up
being an unfortunate interaction between how we implement our
messageport "receive loop" and a pattern found in `npm:piscina` (which
angular uses). The gist of it is that piscina uses an atomic wait loop
along with `receiveMessageOnPort` in its worker threads, and as the
worker is getting started, the following incredibly convoluted series of
events occurs:
1. Parent sends a MessagePort `p` to worker
2. Parent sends a message `m` to the port `p`
3. Parent notifies the worker with `Atomics.notify` that a new message
is available
4. Worker receives message, adds "message" listener to port `p`
5. Adding the listener triggers `MessagePort.start()` on `p`
6. Receive loop in MessagePort.start receives the message `m`, but then
hits an await point and yields (before dispatching the "message" event)
7. Worker continues execution, starts the atomic wait loop, and
immediately receives the existing notification from the parent that a
message is available
8. Worker attempts to receive the new message `m` with
`receiveMessageOnPort`, but this returns `undefined` because the receive
loop already took the message in 6
9. Atomic wait loop continues to next iteration, waiting for the next
message with `Atomic.wait`
10. `Atomic.wait` blocks the worker thread, which prevents the receive
loop from continuing and dispatching the "message" event for the
received message
11. The parent waits for the worker to respond to the first message, and
waits
12. The thread can't make any more progress, and the whole process hangs
The fix I've chosen here (which I don't particularly love, but it works)
is to just delay the `MessagePort.start` call until the end of the event
loop turn, so that the atomic wait loop receives the message first. This
prevents the hang.
---
Those were the main issues causing the hang. There ended up being a few
other small bugs as well, namely `exit` being emitted multiple times,
and not patching up the message port when it's received by
`receiveMessageOnPort`.
|
|
Follow up to https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/23386.
Instead of using async `recv()` method, it was replaced
with a poll based function that doesn't hold onto
RefCell borrow across await point.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23362
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23362
Previously we were panicking if there was a pending read on a
port and `receiveMessageOnPort` was called. This is now fixed
by cancelling the pending read, trying to read a message and
resuming reading in a loop.
|
|
This commit fixes passing `MessagePort` instances to
`WorkerOptions.workerData`.
Before they were not serialized and deserialized properly when spawning
a worker thread.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/22935
|
|
Implementation of `receiveMessageOnPort` for `node:worker_threads`
Fixes: #22702
|
|
|
|
|
|
Functions should generally be annotated with `#[allow]` blocks rather
than using inner `#![allow]` annotations.
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/2699
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/2347
Uses unstable rustfmt features. Since dprint invokes `rustfmt` we do not
need to switch the cargo toolchain to nightly. Do we care about
formatting stability of our codebase across Rust versions? (I don't)
|
|
|
|
This commit uses `DetachedBuffer` instead of `ZeroCopyBuf` in the ops
that back `Worker.prototype.postMessage` and
`MessagePort.prototype.postMessage`. This is done because the
serialized buffer is then copied to the destination isolate, even
though it is internal to runtime code and not used for anything else,
so detaching it and transferring it instead saves an unnecessary copy.
|
|
Co-authored-by: Aaron O'Mullan <aaron.omullan@gmail.com>
|
|
Also cleanup & drop ignored wildcard op-args
|
|
Co-authored-by: Aaron O'Mullan <aaron.omullan@gmail.com>
|
|
Warn on await_holding_refcell_ref clippy rule to avoid this in the future.
Fixes #12453
|
|
|
|
* refactor(ops): return BadResource errors in ResourceTable calls
Instead of relying on callers to map Options to Results via `.ok_or_else(bad_resource_id)` at over 176 different call sites ...
|
|
|
