| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
Just tried this out today and it wasn't properly implemented in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/24156
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/7253
|
|
Updates deno_core to 0.312.0
|
|
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26188
|
|
Behave similar to Node.js where modifying `stdout.columns` doesn't
really resize the terminal. Ref
https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/17529
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26196
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26228
|
|
It should be supported according to
[this](https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-platforms).
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #26184.
It was added but not publicly exported.
|
|
test`, etc) (#26075)
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25533. Fixes
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25396.
Previously we only supported it on `deno install` and `deno cache`,
which is annoying if you're using `nodeModulesDir: auto`.
Also changes from printing output of lifecycle scripts directly to
capturing the output and only printing it on error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26123
|
|
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26120
|
|
We only had integration tests for this and not an integration test.
Closes #26074
|
|
html output (#26100)
Fixes #26107
|
|
A test is going to fail on windows (I'm not on a windows machine atm, so
running the CI to see what fails)
Closes #26080
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26041
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/24421
|
|
Bumped versions for 2.0.0
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
It's very flaky on CI
|
|
For https://github.com/denoland/deno_graph/pull/538/files
This was removed because the deserialization was not backwards
compatible.
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26054
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26047
|
|
|
|
|
|
It shouldn't be needed anymore
|
|
`undefined` (#13348)
Closes #13347
|
|
Signed-off-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
|
|
Does less work when requesting permissions with `-A`
|
|
|
|
Fixes #22995. Fixes #23000.
There were a handful of bugs here causing the hang (each with a
corresponding minimized test):
- We were canceling recv futures when `receiveMessageOnPort` was called,
but this caused the "receive loop" in the message port to exit. This was
due to the fact that `CancelHandle`s are never reset (i.e., once you
`cancel` a `CancelHandle`, it remains cancelled). That meant that after
`receieveMessageOnPort` was called, the subsequent calls to
`op_message_port_recv_message` would throw `Interrupted` exceptions, and
we would exit the loop.
The cancellation, however, isn't actually necessary.
`op_message_port_recv_message` only borrows the underlying port for long
enough to poll the receiver, so the borrow there could never overlap
with `op_message_port_recv_message_sync`.
- Calling `MessagePort.unref()` caused the "receive loop" in the message
port to exit. This was because we were setting
`messageEventListenerCount` to 0 on unref. Not only does that break the
counter when multiple `MessagePort`s are present in the same thread, but
we also exited the "receive loop" whenever the listener count was 0. I
assume this was to prevent the recv promise from keeping the event loop
open.
Instead of this, I chose to just unref the recv promise as needed to
control the event loop.
- The last bug causing the hang (which was a doozy to debug) ended up
being an unfortunate interaction between how we implement our
messageport "receive loop" and a pattern found in `npm:piscina` (which
angular uses). The gist of it is that piscina uses an atomic wait loop
along with `receiveMessageOnPort` in its worker threads, and as the
worker is getting started, the following incredibly convoluted series of
events occurs:
1. Parent sends a MessagePort `p` to worker
2. Parent sends a message `m` to the port `p`
3. Parent notifies the worker with `Atomics.notify` that a new message
is available
4. Worker receives message, adds "message" listener to port `p`
5. Adding the listener triggers `MessagePort.start()` on `p`
6. Receive loop in MessagePort.start receives the message `m`, but then
hits an await point and yields (before dispatching the "message" event)
7. Worker continues execution, starts the atomic wait loop, and
immediately receives the existing notification from the parent that a
message is available
8. Worker attempts to receive the new message `m` with
`receiveMessageOnPort`, but this returns `undefined` because the receive
loop already took the message in 6
9. Atomic wait loop continues to next iteration, waiting for the next
message with `Atomic.wait`
10. `Atomic.wait` blocks the worker thread, which prevents the receive
loop from continuing and dispatching the "message" event for the
received message
11. The parent waits for the worker to respond to the first message, and
waits
12. The thread can't make any more progress, and the whole process hangs
The fix I've chosen here (which I don't particularly love, but it works)
is to just delay the `MessagePort.start` call until the end of the event
loop turn, so that the atomic wait loop receives the message first. This
prevents the hang.
---
Those were the main issues causing the hang. There ended up being a few
other small bugs as well, namely `exit` being emitted multiple times,
and not patching up the message port when it's received by
`receiveMessageOnPort`.
|
|
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Although using `--allow-run` without an allow list gives basically no
security, I think we should remove this warning because it gets in the
way and the only way to disable it is via --quiet.
|
|
Towards https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25241
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
|
|
https://github.com/denoland/deno_npm/pull/70
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26006
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26005
|
|
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26012
```
========================================
failures:
"/WebCryptoAPI/wrapKey_unwrapKey/wrapKey_unwrapKey.https.any.html - Can wrap and unwrap X25519 private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-CTR"
final result: failed. 1 passed; 1 failed; 0 expected failure; total 2 (15646ms)
diff --git a/Users/divy/gh/deno/tests/wpt/runner/expectation.json b/var/folders/ll/ltqsx4nx72v5_r7rlsl36pgm0000gn/T/375d79f1257b05cd
index fb2063935..4449c5d15 100644
--- a/Users/divy/gh/deno/tests/wpt/runner/expectation.json
+++ b/var/folders/ll/ltqsx4nx72v5_r7rlsl36pgm0000gn/T/375d79f1257b05cd
@@ -1531,6 +1531,7 @@
},
"wrapKey_unwrapKey": {
"wrapKey_unwrapKey.https.any.html": [
+ "Can wrap and unwrap X25519 private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-CTR",
"Can wrap and unwrap X25519 private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-CBC",
"Can wrap and unwrap X25519 private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-GCM",
"Can wrap and unwrap X25519 private key keys as non-extractable using pkcs8 and AES-KW",
```
|
|
(#25811)
|
